diff options
author | (quasar) nebula <qznebula@protonmail.com> | 2023-08-31 20:19:22 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | (quasar) nebula <qznebula@protonmail.com> | 2023-09-05 21:02:56 -0300 |
commit | a3b80f08fc54cda6a6787bcd078059823026add6 (patch) | |
tree | 0318deab9058e964dcc0e46c75d79bffc8cf7f22 | |
parent | 8e783429194f58909f26c7b11d558d5b0a9b163f (diff) |
data: update Thing.composition.from documentation
-rw-r--r-- | src/data/things/thing.js | 44 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/data/things/thing.js b/src/data/things/thing.js index 1c99a323..19f5fb53 100644 --- a/src/data/things/thing.js +++ b/src/data/things/thing.js @@ -565,6 +565,14 @@ export default class Thing extends CacheableObject { // }, // ]); // + // One last note! A super common code pattern when creating more complex + // compositions is to have several steps which *only* expose and compose. + // As a syntax shortcut, you can skip the outer section. It's basically + // like writing out just the {expose: {...}} part. Remember that this + // indicates that the step you're defining is compositional, so you have + // to specify the flags manually for the base, even if this property isn't + // going to get an {update: true} flag. + // // == Cache-safe dependency names: == // // [Disclosure: The caching engine hasn't actually been implemented yet. @@ -705,7 +713,7 @@ export default class Thing extends CacheableObject { // expanded to the scope of the composition instead of following steps. // // For example, suppose your composition (which you expect to include in - // other compositions) brings about several internal, hash-prefixed + // other compositions) brings about several private, hash-prefixed // dependencies to contribute to its own results. Those dependencies won't // end up "bleeding" into the dependency list of whichever composition is // nesting this one - they will totally disappear once all the steps in @@ -718,6 +726,40 @@ export default class Thing extends CacheableObject { // a hash just like the exports from any other compositional step; they're // still dynamically provided dependencies!) // + // Another way to "export" dependencies is by using calling *any* step's + // `continuation.raise()` function. This is sort of like early exiting, + // but instead of quitting out the whole entire property, it will just + // break out of the current, nested composition's list of steps, acting + // as though the composition had finished naturally. The dependencies + // passed to `raise` will be the ones which get exported. + // + // Since `raise` is another way to export dependencies, if you're using + // dynamic export names, you should specify `mapContinuation` on the step + // calling `continuation.raise` as well. + // + // An important note on `mapDependencies` here: A nested composition gets + // free access to all the ordinary properties defined on the thing it's + // working on, but if you want it to depend on *private* dependencies - + // ones prefixed with '#' - which were provided by some other compositional + // step preceding wherever this one gets nested, then you *have* to use + // `mapDependencies` to gain access. Check out the section on "cache-safe + // dependency names" for information on this syntax! + // + // Also - on rare occasion - you might want to make a reusable composition + // that itself causes the composition *it's* nested in to raise. If that's + // the case, give `composition.raiseAbove()` a go! This effectively means + // kicking out of *two* layers of nested composition - the one including + // the step with the `raiseAbove` call, and the composition which that one + // is nested within. You don't need to use `raiseAbove` if the reusable + // utility function just returns a single compositional step, but if you + // want to make use of other compositional steps, it gives you access to + // the same conditional-raise capabilities. + // + // Have some syntax sugar! Since nested compositions are defined by having + // the base be {compose: true}, the composition will infer as much if you + // don't specifying the base's flags at all. Simply use the same shorthand + // syntax as for other compositional steps, and it'll work out cleanly! + // from(firstArg, secondArg) { const debug = fn => { if (Thing.composite.from.debug === true) { |